![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West, Singapore
Posts: 887
|
Can any one please post some pictures shot using the new 28-75/f2.8 lens with 7D, perferable to be in day time with a blur back ground at the back. Exclude macro shoots please. please help.
Please shoot in f/2.8 please. thanks. Last edited by forbytes; 10th December 2004 at 05:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 2,603
|
![]() from dpreview.com.. what wrong with bokeh? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
|
Compare the tamron with say a sigma, canon or nikon 70-200 at 70mm 2.8. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
how's this?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 342
|
basically i think it uses the same optical design as tamron 28-75 XR di.. which is proven to be a very gd value for money lens
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West, Singapore
Posts: 887
|
Drudkh image shows better bokeh than phil's one. The one posted by phil was really bad. But point to note is that there is a large blown out highlight on the top right of Drudkh's image which "reduces" the severness of the issue. Generally I find the lens quite bad. Sharpness is there but...
for more details on bokeh, click here. and here too. Show you one neutral bokeh, with greenry. file reduced by 75% Now this one is quite bad. Sharpness there. ![]() Last edited by forbytes; 12th December 2004 at 01:06 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|