![]() |
|
|||||||
| World of Nature Images of animals taken in the wild, in captivity or of pets in your home. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North
Posts: 2,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North
Posts: 2,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lion City
Posts: 708
|
Wow! very nice and sharp.... D100 with AFS 80-200mm f2.8
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North
Posts: 2,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,492
|
Someone organise a showdown at the Zoo, we can call it 'Rumble in the Jungle' Clubsnap will be the first on the internet with such a shoot.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Yishun Cavern
Posts: 118
|
Nice pics willy!
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
Digital SLR really give you good dof.
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,078
|
Sorry guys but how in the world do you figure out good sharpness from pictures that are only about 400 pixels wide? Almost anything that's in focus should be sharp at those dimensions. If anything I can already see that one or two of the pics are not in focus, or not sharp for whatever reason.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,492
|
![]() I agree about the 400 pixel comment. Look at Deegos' shots, presumably taken with a consumer digicam: http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthrea...threadid=10492 they're amazing quality, if anything, as good as a DSLR shot (at this reduced number of pixels). Last edited by erwinx; 22nd July 2002 at 09:24 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|