ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Photo Galleries > Wedding Portfolios

Wedding Portfolios Showcase of memorable and beautiful weddings photos.


 
Thread Tools
Old 24th November 2004   #1
arttl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Planet PJ
Posts: 1,349
Default Some wedding pics to share....

Hi guys,

There're some wedding assignments which I've taken and would like to share with all of ya.

As usual, constructive comments are always welcome. Too bad, I can't upload them here. (Dunno how to upload leh... )

Here's the link to the photos: Wedding Pics

Thanks!
__________________
WWW.JONYEAP.COM
arttl is offline  
Old 25th November 2004   #2
melvinfoo
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 336
Default

good series, mind to share what camera and lens use? keep it up!
melvinfoo is offline  
Old 25th November 2004   #3
fengwei
Moderator
 
fengwei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 9,105
Default

Quite good indeed. Really love most of them, especially Fuji S2 Pro's color

But I found you like to tilt the camera a lot, not too suitable to get a big print with a tilt photo I guess.

Thanks for sharing.
fengwei is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 25th November 2004   #4
Pun'k
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Punk City
Posts: 8
Default

How did u make the effects in this pic.

http://www.arttl.com/imgs/upload/product/Dscf4867.jpg

The rose part...
Pun'k is offline  
Old 25th November 2004   #5
arttl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Planet PJ
Posts: 1,349
Default

Thanks for the comments.

I'm using S2 Pro most of the time. Lens differ but was using the Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 till I switched to the Nikkor 17-35mm f2.8. Other lens use very often is the Nikkor 12-24 f4.

Oh yes, I also felt that I tend to tilt my camera alot. Still got lots of stuff to learn man! Thanks!
__________________
WWW.JONYEAP.COM
arttl is offline  
Old 26th November 2004   #6
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

Originally Posted by Pun'k
How did u make the effects in this pic.

http://www.arttl.com/imgs/upload/product/Dscf4867.jpg

The rose part...
Use PS loh...
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 29th November 2004   #7
arttl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Planet PJ
Posts: 1,349
Default

Thanks to those who have commented.

Will further improve from here.

Anyone, anymore?
__________________
WWW.JONYEAP.COM
arttl is offline  
Old 29th November 2004   #8
megaweb
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,106
Default

The shots are not in sequence .. I would prefer to have the camera in focus (closer view) than the person :P

overall is nice and simple ..
__________________
See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap | Pbase
megaweb is offline  
Old 29th November 2004   #9
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
Default

Nice works, keep it up.
Personally find that you indoor available light shots are nicer.
catchlights is offline  
Old 29th November 2004   #10
arttl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Planet PJ
Posts: 1,349
Default

Thanks Megaweb and Catchlights!

Will improve from here....
__________________
WWW.JONYEAP.COM
arttl is offline  
Old 30th November 2004   #11
serendipity
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 447
Default

Hi arttl. Nice photos you have there. And learn that you are using the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Digital lens. What do you think of the lens? And what makes you decided to change to Nikkor AFS 17-35mm f2.8. I have being looking for the reviews for sometime already. Thanks alot.
serendipity is offline  
Old 30th November 2004   #12
arttl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Planet PJ
Posts: 1,349
Default

Originally Posted by serendipity
Hi arttl. Nice photos you have there. And learn that you are using the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Digital lens. What do you think of the lens? And what makes you decided to change to Nikkor AFS 17-35mm f2.8. I have being looking for the reviews for sometime already. Thanks alot.
The Sigma lens tends to be a little soft in overall pic quality. N the focusing is definately not as fast as the Nikon 17-35. (despite the 15mm difference in zoom) But I should say that it's a good and cheaper alternative to the Nikon 17-35 in that zoom range. Personally, I think the 15mm zoom difference doesn't make a huge difference in covering weddings, as MOST of the time, we can close in to the subject.

But hey! There are some nice pics taken with the Sigma lens too!

Cos I'm also using Nikon FM on some occasions thus the Sigma lens couldn't be used on it.

Nevertheless, the lens has found a new owner!

Cheers!
__________________
WWW.JONYEAP.COM
arttl is offline  
Old 30th November 2004   #13
serendipity
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 447
Default

Hi arttl. Thanks alot on the pointers. So you are also using FM, so that explains why you didn't consider the 17-55mm DX. Thanks again.
serendipity is offline  
Old 30th November 2004   #14
arttl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Planet PJ
Posts: 1,349
Default

Originally Posted by serendipity
Hi arttl. Thanks alot on the pointers. So you are also using FM, so that explains why you didn't consider the 17-55mm DX. Thanks again.
No thanks at all! These are just some 'reviews' from a user. But then again, I could be wrong to a certain extend.

Oh yes... the 17-55 is a lovely lens which will be making it's way to my dry cabi soon.... Very good lens for my D2H....
__________________
WWW.JONYEAP.COM
arttl is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.09363 seconds with 7 queries