it totally does not prove anything.
what's the purpose for this test?
Can panasonic beat D100 if you print it bigger? let's say 12R?
To me it's like comparing Carlsberg with Tequila. On a smaller portion, tequilla seems taste better. But once you drink it in a jug's portion, tequila will kill you, while Carlsberg still give no effect of degradation to your brain
It's just a casual comparison of quality.it totally does not prove anything.
Well, your analogy, I do not understand.Originally Posted by popeye
But the purpose of this casual test, was not to show whether a panasonic can beat a d100 on a 12R print. But rather, something far more fundamental.
Prosumer cameras are these days are much closer in terms of image quality, as compared to Dslrs.
Have a nice day.
Hmm... so what's the fundamental stuff?
If both pictures are interpolated, I don't really see the basis for comparision. It might just become a demonstration of CS's interpolation capability.
As someone who actually owns and uses a LC1, I find your review to be quite fair and balanced. No camera, DSLR or P&S digicam, is perfect but the razor sharp Leica Summicron lens coupled with the stylishly retro analog controls make the LC1 in my book despite its failings (and which camera does not have any?) and a worthy companion to my DSLR for those times when I don't feel like lugging along a ton of equipment on an outing.
i applaud for your effort in sharing your tests in this community
Excellent tests, Marcwang.
Indeed, it provide a very good detailed information especially to Panasonic LC 1 users.
Appreciate your great effort in sharing your views in clubsnap.
Keep it up, always read your thread with interest.
War is one of the most regrettable human activities.