![]() |
|
|||||||
| Land/City-scapes and Travel The world around us, and the beautiful surroundings we live in. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
Posts: 6,711
|
Some feeble attempt in landscape.
#1 Would want wider perspective, but alas limited by physical environment ![]() #2 Same situation as above ![]()
__________________
>> Some Little Gallery << |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
Posts: 6,711
|
![]()
__________________
>> Some Little Gallery << |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,038
|
Go wider? I actually thought it would be much better if you go closer to isolate a particular portion of the scene.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Side
Posts: 79
|
Hi all, Noob speaking...
Hope that someone can give me a hand here. I tried to take a similar pic to yours and from what I read, the trick to getting a "smooth" water effect is to give a slow shutter speed. I tried it but the result was that the camera took in too much light and caused the whole pic to be extremely over exposed. Then I played with the aperature setting it to f8 but still too much light was going in, killing the picture. I used about shutter speed 1sec. Any faster and it seem that the effect was gone. Any advise would be much appreciated... Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
Posts: 6,711
|
__________________
>> Some Little Gallery << |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
Posts: 6,711
|
You'll need something called a Neutral Density (ND) filter.
For me, I've used a circular polariser (CPL) to cut the amount of light. ![]() My settings are about 1/6 - 1/15s @ F19-22. Read up more on NDs.
__________________
>> Some Little Gallery << |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Side
Posts: 79
|
Cool... Thanks for the advice! I currently have a CPL. Will try it again. Hope to be able to take some decent waterfall pics. Cheers!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
Posts: 6,711
|
You should use ND to achieve those silky smooth effect.
__________________
>> Some Little Gallery << |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,038
|
I take it as alternate views of the scene. Could work especially when the background is distracting and the lighting's pretty harsh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,411
|
I really like the second photo. Never thought the place looked that good. It's good to see familar things thru someoe else's eyes, a different perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,106
|
The moving water and some parts of the rock are overexposed. You need gradual ND filter to balance the exposure between the scenery and the rock/water. Another way is get correct exposure of the rock/water and use PS to balance the exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
Posts: 6,711
|
Will need PS to balance the exposure. ![]()
__________________
>> Some Little Gallery << |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: strewberry farm
Posts: 258
|
f/16 1sec iso100 expouse -0.7 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|