Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 42 of 42

Thread: question for the experienced

  1. #41


    built qualilty: noisier motors, shorter lifespan, coating, less built like a tank etc.
    performance: optical quality, sharpness, CA, AF speed, accuracy etc.
    but depends on which lens. there are exceptions to the general observation.

    i don't mind lighter plastic mount lens, as i don't go photographing war conditions, and don't drop stuff carelessly.

    some 3rd party have useful ranges 1st party don't have. and easier on the pocket.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Cocteau Twins


    Quote Originally Posted by eudoofus
    i don't want to assume things. he could know things i don't.

    for all i know, he could be taking great award winning photos with a disposable camera.
    eudoofus, when he makes comments like that, and seriously means it, you can safely assume he is a doofus, lol

    and if he did take an award winning picture with a disposable camera, we would have heard of him already, won't we?

    and if he really did win an award with the camera, his statement would really fall apart, wouldn't it? what is he doing with a lousy camera with a lousy lens?lol

    ok i shall stop here. seriously OT-ing already
    Last edited by Stereobox; 14th November 2004 at 11:04 PM.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts