Is it the lens or the processing? The CA fringing looks quite badOriginally Posted by tecnica
That is a nice photo... but somehow it still don't work for me... guess I am not a wide angle person... I can save some money then... hahahaha...
As to Spree's photo... don't know why, can't seemed to load on my system... these few days my home network seemed abit cockup, many of flickr photos cannot show, and I cannot download some of the files on the net too. Bloody hell, gonna complain to Starhub soon.
Anyway, I think the 10-22mm is a really nice lens... I cannot afford them at the moment, and I don't use much of wide angle too. So yeah... maybe other might be more poisoned. Hahahaha.
Wow, this is beautifulOriginally Posted by tecnica
Well... at present moment, the widest I go was 28mm... I am not a landscape person, so yeah... cannot share any pics at the moment, flickr don't load at all when I am at home. I will sneak a peek and maybe upload one or two of my photos (to poison someone here) when I have the time. hahahahaha.
Can't really see much panning doneOriginally Posted by tecnica
Last edited by cws77; 7th December 2011 at 11:02 PM. Reason: automatic censored a word which became ****