Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: what after 18-105...

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    16

    Default what after 18-105...

    Hi guys... I had the D7000 with the kit lens.. but seems it is not enough... SO now my problem is what after this lens... Do I get the 18-200 or something better? please advice..thanks

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Tampines
    Posts
    265

    Default

    I'm no nikon user. But here's a tip, if you don't know what you want or what you need, means you don't need to get more lenses. If you're sure of your range, then buy accordingly. Eg. Landscape, buy wide angle. Sports, tele-zoom. All in one, 18-200 or walkabout lenses like 24-70. So ask yourself first, what do you shoot and what range are you shooting at.

  3. #3
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fattytey View Post
    Hi guys... I had the D7000 with the kit lens.. but seems it is not enough... SO now my problem is what after this lens... Do I get the 18-200 or something better? please advice..thanks
    not enough as in this lens not good enough for you?

    if that is the case, try rent the 17-55f2.8 to try it out
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North-East
    Posts
    1,976

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    TS needs to elaborate more by what is not enough? In terms of range or quality???
    In the eyes of the beholder!

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    16

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    my problem is... Do i buy the 18-200 or the 55-200/300, I need to know the real difference between these 2 lenses... Cos the 18-2200 is only longer than my present 18-105.. anything else that I need to note? cos I am still a novice DSLR guy.. THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK..

  6. #6

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fattytey View Post
    my problem is... Do i buy the 18-200 or the 55-200/300, I need to know the real difference between these 2 lenses... Cos the 18-2200 is only longer than my present 18-105.. anything else that I need to note? cos I am still a novice DSLR guy.. THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK..
    i am also quite new. I got a relatively cheap 35mm f1.8 lens for night/low light shots. If u got $$$ can get f1.4.

    U want more zoom get 70-300 instead of 55-300. Just a couple of hundred more only but suppose to have better performance

  7. #7
    Member GReddyZC76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    singapore, northeast
    Posts
    590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnbon

    i am also quite new. I got a relatively cheap 35mm f1.8 lens for night/low light shots. If u got $$$ can get f1.4.

    U want more zoom get 70-300 instead of 55-300. Just a couple of hundred more only but suppose to have better performance
    35mm f/1.4? :lol: :lol:

    Ya TS 'not enuff' means what? Aperture not enuff? Tele- no enuff? Or wide- no enuff???

    If so since u have 18-105, maybe can 'bite the missile' , invest in 14-24 f/2.8 + 70-200 f/2.8
    [D800|AFS2470F2.8G|AFS70200F2.8G|AFS1635F4G|AFS28F1 .8G|AF85F1.8D|AFDC105F2D|SB700|SB900]

  8. #8

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Quote Originally Posted by GReddyZC76 View Post
    35mm f/1.4? :lol: :lol:

    Ya TS 'not enuff' means what? Aperture not enuff? Tele- no enuff? Or wide- no enuff???

    If so since u have 18-105, maybe can 'bite the missile' , invest in 14-24 f/2.8 + 70-200 f/2.8
    You can't read or what? TS already said:

    "Do i buy the 18-200 or the 55-200/300, I need to know the real difference between these 2 lenses".

    Aiyaya....

    BTW 18-200 is good enough if convenience is important to you, TS. Optical inferior to 18-105 and 55-200/300 in their respective ranges. Also very expensive. There has been reports of breakdown of flex circuit (search this up).

    And with 18-200 there is significant focal length breathing - at 200mm near min focus the lens behave more like 135mm - a trick pulled by designers to make superzoom compact and focus close through intentional shortening of focal length. Doesn't happen with 55-200/300 - but then the min focus distance is longer.

    55-200 and 55-300 essentially identical in the overlap range. I suggest you buy used for 55-200, very cheap in BnS. 55-200 much better value.

    If you go 55-300 route, probably better to go 70-300. Get VR in all instances.

  9. #9
    Senior Member cichlid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    S'pore
    Posts
    5,060

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    TS, i think you have to know what you want.

    Bigger aperture or longer focal length?

  10. #10
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fattytey View Post
    my problem is... Do i buy the 18-200 or the 55-200/300, I need to know the real difference between these 2 lenses... Cos the 18-2200 is only longer than my present 18-105.. anything else that I need to note? cos I am still a novice DSLR guy.. THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK..
    18-200 is a all in one lens, works well if you want to cover a lot of focal length without changing lens, you can replace your existing lens with this lens.

    a 50-200/300 lens is to work with another lens which able to provide you a longer reach, so you need to keep your existing lens too.

    your lens arsenal is to suit your need and your style of shooting, nobody can really tell you what lens you should buy or own, only you have the answer you want, and you need to find it out yourself.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  11. #11

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Try to find out what focal length you used the most. Should give you a clue what to get next.
    Please Don't Report This Post To A Moderator

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    16

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    I say if i would like to shoot more landscape in trips... I should look for 55-200/300? or something else.. I need something of a different spec than 18-105... thanks.. or use wide scope lenses with abit of zoom?

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bishan
    Posts
    515

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    try different lenses to see what you prefer lor,
    for me, after 5-6 years, my shooting now revolves around the 35mm, 50mm and 85mm primes, all f/1.8,
    I find that these 3 lenses is light enough, easy on the pocket, and am satisfied with the IQs

  14. #14

    Default

    What after 18/105 .... Hmmmmm .....
    What you want after 18/105 would be a better question to yourself.

    Zoom with less distortion, light ... 16/85 vr
    Zoom with low light, less distortion, heavy ...... 17/55 f2.8
    All in one zoom ....... 18/200 (worst performance)
    Prime ......... Best quality and light (force you to think before you shoot)

    So if you cannot answer yourself .. Hang on to 18/105

  15. #15
    Member chillicutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Telok Blangah
    Posts
    727

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    I am using 35mm f1.8 as a walkabout lens and I am happy with it!

    Perhaps it will suit you as well~
    Last edited by chillicutter; 14th November 2011 at 11:09 AM.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    16

    Red face Re: what after 18-105...

    Thanks for all e feedback.. I will definitely keep the kit lens but may Buy the 55-200.. Think this is good enough a combination?

  17. #17
    Senior Member luckyorange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Ang Mo Kio
    Posts
    2,843
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    I've a D7k also, used it with 35mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.8g so far no problem =)
    Lousy de My Flickr

  18. #18

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fattytey View Post
    Thanks for all e feedback.. I will definitely keep the kit lens but may Buy the 55-200.. Think this is good enough a combination?
    yes...seriously..if you dontknow what to buy..that means you probably dont need it. If you MUST BUY then best is to buy another lens that is longer or shorter than current so at least you have more range to play with.. so yea 55-200 may be good for you. But seriously..dont buy for the sake of buying..unless you really dont care that few hundred or thousands

  19. #19
    New Member kriegsketten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern Enclave
    Posts
    2,560

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fattytey View Post
    Thanks for all e feedback.. I will definitely keep the kit lens but may Buy the 55-200.. Think this is good enough a combination?
    The answer may be a very subjective one. Some people feels that it would be a good combination since they do not need fast auto focusing (for sports, fast moving subjects, etc) and do not shoot indoors or low lights often. But if you ask me between 55-200 and 18-200, I'd choose the former. 18-200 maybe very convenient since you do not need to change lenses, but image quality-wise 55-200 VR is better. But like some suggested, 70-300 VR is quicker in Auto-focusing, gives you longer reach (100mm more), doesn't overlap your kit lenses more. It is entirely up to you.
    Last edited by kriegsketten; 14th November 2011 at 11:52 AM.
    Myflickr | Zoom in for the KILL!

  20. #20

    Default Re: what after 18-105...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fattytey View Post
    I say if i would like to shoot more landscape in trips... I should look for 55-200/300? or something else.. I need something of a different spec than 18-105... thanks.. or use wide scope lenses with abit of zoom?
    Landscape ? tokina 11-16mm , less than 1K for new....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •