![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
|
The most popular moment for serious photographer...'Golden Hours'
![]()
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 66
|
donkuok,
I noticed you have the FujiFilm 4900Z. I am curious to know if the FZ20 takes better photos at 1600x1200 when compared to the fuji. I know the FZ20 is 5mp, so I am not comparing resolution but I am more interested in color and clarity. Hopefully you can post some comparisions. Thanks very much. rgds Myfz1 |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
|
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
|
As requested, I've made a comparison with Fz20 and Fujifilm 4900Z. Here you go...
Fujifilm 4900Z, Auto Balance, ISO125, 1/3s, 1600X1200 FZ20, Auto Balance, ISO100, 1/3s, 1600X1200 Conclusion, FZ20 definitely a winner. I found fujifilm's white balance a bit warmer. FZ20 exhibited correct white balance exact from my eyesight
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip Last edited by donkuok; 7th November 2004 at 09:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
|
to be fair, I tried both ISO200
Fujifilm 4900Z: FZ20:
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Eunos
Posts: 2,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
|
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 66
|
Thanks for the comparisions. FZ20 really sharp and virtually no noise at iso200.Time to save money for a new FZ20
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|