ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Panasonic

Panasonic ideas for life


 
Thread Tools
Old 7th November 2004   #1
donkuok
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
Default Golden hours

The most popular moment for serious photographer...'Golden Hours'

__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip
donkuok is offline  
Old 7th November 2004   #2
Myfz1
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 66
Default

donkuok,

I noticed you have the FujiFilm 4900Z. I am curious to know if the FZ20 takes better photos at 1600x1200 when compared to the fuji. I know the FZ20 is 5mp, so I am not comparing resolution but I am more interested in color and clarity. Hopefully you can post some comparisions.

Thanks very much.
rgds
Myfz1
Myfz1 is offline  
Old 7th November 2004   #3
donkuok
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
Default

Originally Posted by Myfz1
donkuok,

I noticed you have the FujiFilm 4900Z. I am curious to know if the FZ20 takes better photos at 1600x1200 when compared to the fuji. I know the FZ20 is 5mp, so I am not comparing resolution but I am more interested in color and clarity. Hopefully you can post some comparisions.

Thanks very much.
rgds
Myfz1
have not tried that. I presume FZ20 would be much better quality than FujiFilm 4900Z. Anyway i may try later
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip
donkuok is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 7th November 2004   #4
donkuok
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
Default

As requested, I've made a comparison with Fz20 and Fujifilm 4900Z. Here you go...

Fujifilm 4900Z, Auto Balance, ISO125, 1/3s, 1600X1200


FZ20, Auto Balance, ISO100, 1/3s, 1600X1200


Conclusion, FZ20 definitely a winner. I found fujifilm's white balance a bit warmer. FZ20 exhibited correct white balance exact from my eyesight
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip

Last edited by donkuok; 7th November 2004 at 09:56 PM.
donkuok is offline  
Old 7th November 2004   #5
donkuok
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
Default

to be fair, I tried both ISO200

Fujifilm 4900Z:


FZ20:
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip
donkuok is offline  
Old 7th November 2004   #6
JimDavis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Eunos
Posts: 2,734
Default

Originally Posted by donkuok
to be fair, I tried both ISO200

Fujifilm 4900Z:


FZ20:
Seems like Fujufilm 4900Z not as sharp. Also, it exhibits a little more noise than FZ20...
JimDavis is offline  
Old 7th November 2004   #7
donkuok
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 902
Default

Originally Posted by JimDavis
Seems like Fujufilm 4900Z not as sharp. Also, it exhibits a little more noise than FZ20...
It's considered not bad liao for 3 years ago.
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip
donkuok is offline  
Old 8th November 2004   #8
Myfz1
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 66
Default

Thanks for the comparisions. FZ20 really sharp and virtually no noise at iso200.Time to save money for a new FZ20
Myfz1 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.08625 seconds with 7 queries