![]() |
|
|||||||
| Others All other makes/brands/DIY & misc photographic gadgets discussed here. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
Was wondering whether ISO1600 on the 602Z would be of any use for myself; tested it out and here're the shots.
Test Shot 1: ---------------- Shutter Speed : 1/169 s Lens Aperture : F3.2 Test Shot 2: ---------------- ![]() Shutter Speed : 1/194 s Lens Aperture : F3.2 Test Shot 3: ---------------- ![]() Shutter Speed : 1/84 s Lens Aperture : F2.8 Last edited by imaginary_number; 4th March 2003 at 09:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,239
|
Seems not bad for ISO1600 on a Prosumer Digital Camera.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
My conclusion : Apparently, after being resized to 640x480 (original:1280x960), the image looks presentable. I've resized it to 320x240 as well and it looks quite sharp at that size.
Noise can be quite obvious but it's nothing to be horrified about. IMO, the image is quite good enough for displaying on the web or for smaller printouts. Feel free to comment ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
It's still quite acceptable, IMO. Just that noise is more apparent in the darker areas.
Check it out : original image file > test shot 2 |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|