Opinion on Nikkor 35-70 f2.8 D

Bean · 18th May 2002

For those who has used this lens before, what is your opinion on this lens (performance, cost etc.)?

How does this lens compared to 3rd-party equivilent like Sigma and Tokina?

All comments are welcomed!

Thanks!

Ian · 18th May 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Bean

For those who has used this lens before, what is your opinion on this lens (performance, cost etc.)?

How does this lens compared to 3rd-party equivilent like Sigma and Tokina?

All comments are welcomed!

Thanks!

It's an excellent performer in the real world and a cheap alternative to the far more expensive and heavier 28-70/2.8 AFS lens. Optically the lens has low barrel distortion and light falloff in the corners and gives really good images between about f5.6 and 11. The lens has 15 elements in 12 groups and takes 62mm filters. Weight is quite good at 655 grams (compared to 935gr for the AFS 28-70). It's available in AFn and AFn-D versions.

The examples I've used have quite noticable flare when shooting near the sun in harsh lighting conditions.

My only bitch with the lens is the rotating front end of the lens that makes using a polarizing filter a bit of a pain, but this is a minor drawback given the quality of the lens and it's low price on the used market.

Used prices range from about 250 to 400 USD depending on version and condition.

It's a far more capable performer than the Sigma and is better than the highly rated Tokina. Build quality is excellent.

Kho King · 18th May 2002

it is a push pull zoom...

only 35-70mm compare to current 28-70/80mm standard...

its price in 2nd hand is about the same as Tokina ATX Pro 28-80mm, and higher than Sigma EX 28-70mm.

new price is higher than new Tokina or Sigma.

SzennyBoy · 19th May 2002

I've had this lens for over 8 years now and I'm still using it. What I really like about it is that it is a true zoom... you can focus on a subject at 70mm and when you zoom out to 35mm, the subject is still in sharp focus. Most zoom requires you to re-focus.

One known problem with this lens though is that because it is a push-pull zoom, there is the zoom creep issue. When you zoom out to 35mm and tilt you camera/lens up, the barrel will slowly creep back down to the 70mm position. This is only a major problem if you are taking picture on an inclined plane... but for this to really to be an issue, you'd be having your system mounted on a tripod. Otherwise, you left hand would normally be holding on to the lens!

18th May 2002	#1
Bean Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 855	Opinion on Nikkor 35-70 f2.8 D For those who has used this lens before, what is your opinion on this lens (performance, cost etc.)? How does this lens compared to 3rd-party equivilent like Sigma and Tokina? All comments are welcomed! Thanks!

18th May 2002	#3
Kho King Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,799	it is a push pull zoom... only 35-70mm compare to current 28-70/80mm standard... its price in 2nd hand is about the same as Tokina ATX Pro 28-80mm, and higher than Sigma EX 28-70mm. new price is higher than new Tokina or Sigma. __________________ KOH KHO KING http://ShaShinKi.com ~ Malaysia Online Camera Shop! :cool:

19th May 2002	#4
SzennyBoy Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: London, UK Posts: 694	I've had this lens for over 8 years now and I'm still using it. What I really like about it is that it is a true zoom... you can focus on a subject at 70mm and when you zoom out to 35mm, the subject is still in sharp focus. Most zoom requires you to re-focus. One known problem with this lens though is that because it is a push-pull zoom, there is the zoom creep issue. When you zoom out to 35mm and tilt you camera/lens up, the barrel will slowly creep back down to the 70mm position. This is only a major problem if you are taking picture on an inclined plane... but for this to really to be an issue, you'd be having your system mounted on a tripod. Otherwise, you left hand would normally be holding on to the lens!