1,054 Active Users
There are currently 512 members and 542 guests online.
Most users ever online was 3264 on Sunday, 7 February 2010 at 23:41:21hrs.

ClubSNAP reviews the Seagate FreeAgent Xtreme
by Edmund Tan

Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical Field Test
by Ortega

Quick user-review of Tamron AF 28-300mm/f3.5-6.3 (IF) Macro Aspherical LD Di
by Nightwolf75

Review of Tamron SP AF 10-24mm/f3.5-4.5 DiII (Nikon mount)
by Nightwolf75

ClubSNAP @ Olympus E-3 Tokyo Launch
by Edmund Tan

Aperture : Digital Goes Analogue
by Augustine Tan

ClubSNAP's Photography 101 for Newbies
by David Wong

Life In A Relief Camp (Bam, Iran)
by Daniel Wee

Olympus C5050 Review
by Megaweb

Fun with Photoshop ? Borders and Signatures
by Tommy Gui

Fun with Photoshop - Soft Focus
by Tommy Gui

Kodak DCS Pro 14n Review
by Larry

Olympus C750 Review
by Megaweb

70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AFS VR Zoom-Nikkor Review
by Darren Lau

ClubSNAP @ Singapore Street Festival
by togu

Step-by-step DIY CCD Cleaning
by sfhuang

Slides Chart
by Megaweb

more articles....


 

ClubSNAP - Kodak DCS Pro 14n review

Kodak DCS Pro 14n: 14 Million Reasons To Go Digital

It's All About Image Quality

[Caveat - Having only had the DCS-14n review unit for the short span of 3 days, and sadly lacking the proper facilities for testing resolution, colour accuracy and even technical details such as battery life and so on, I approached this review as I would a novice user.

Thus, I explored the different uses of the camera, and attempted to sample as many scenarios as the limited time allowed. Ideally, an extensive review calls for much longer evaluation time - a minimum of 2 weeks IMHO - and conducted in the presence of scientific tools and measuring gauges with other experts present. Please allow for some skewed data and bear in mind that this review should be supplement by other research and hands-on experience at your nearest camera retailer.]

Excellent Pixel Quality and Output
On a personal level, I was quite impressed by the image quality and technology offered by the Kodak 14-n.

The 4536 x 3024 pixel (effective), 12-bit CMOS image sensor of the DCS-14n is the first F-mount camera to go full-frame (covering the full 24mm by 36mm image area of 35mm film). This means that there's no limitation on the use of true wide-angle lenses (including those creative fisheye lens, although wide-angle shots would likely not be a real issue with the launch of the Nikkor AF-S 12-24mm f/4G DX lens). With the DCS Pro 14n photographers have the freedom to select the image size (full 14MP, 6MP, and 3MP) that suits the shooting environment.

Images are captured at about two frames per second and can be saved as DCR raw files or Kodak ERI-JPEG files. In brief, Kodak ERI-JPEGs provide about two-stops of exposure latitude and extended color space within a JPEG workflow. What this translates to is that photographers now gain the benefits of the compressed storage size of JPEG files and the flexible of RAW files.

The DCS-14n easily boasts one of the greatest dynamic range that I've ever seen in any professional digital camera. Image sensors in general have an annoying tendency to capture blown highlights, but the DCS-14n's CMOS sensor, combined with the ERI-JPEG technology, allows blown areas to be recovered. Both highlights and deep shadows held details, which is certainly a boon to pixel purists. This allows for an exceptional range of details to be captured.

Rescuing details from images through Kodak's ERI technology and the dynamic range of the DCS 14n

Even in brightly lit scenes, a very high level of detail in shadow areas could be seen at low ISO settings (from 80 to about 125). The fine image detail comes at a price, though. In areas of high sharpness, aliasing (jagged edges) are apparent. Unlike previous Kodak cameras, an antialiasing filter was not included on the DCS Pro 14n. While these artifacts can be reduced in the supplied Photo Desk software, this means additional image manipulation in the digital workflow, and requires some expertise.

Image sharpness is also very impressive, and color and saturation are fairly accurate, producing skin tones that are generally pleasing. Looking at images taken in a studio setting with the DCS-14n under studio lights (taken with a Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 Micro lens), the colour tones were almost spot-on, requiring only a minimum of post-processing to render the correct levels.

Sample of the DCS 14n's colour tones and details

Unfortunately, there wasn't enough time to carry out a proper portrait session in a studio environment, which I suspect is the forte of the DCS-14n. Its full-frame sensor, low ISO performance and sensor size all points to that conclusion - this is a camera that is most at home sitting on a tripod in a controlled environment surrounded by studio lights and reflectors.

Where the DCS-14n excels in is of course the much-lauded 14 million megapixel sensor. Suffice to say that you wouldn't realize how much details are lacking from most digital images until you've viewed one from the DCS-14n. Suddenly a whole world of details opened up to me. A distant window shows objects inside instead of a dark blurry patch. Cars in the distance could be readily identified instead of being anonymous blips. Suffice to say that you would take a full-size file from the DCS-14n, crop it to a sixth of its size and still produce decent 8" by 12" prints.

Demonstrating how much details can be captured in a full 14 megapixel image file

ISO performance, however, leaves something to be desired. The noise found in ISO setting above 200 were quite extensive, which means it's less than ideal for low-light or fast action situations. Long exposure shots also contained a high amount of digital noise.

Original image and image samples taken @ 80 & 100 ISO settings

Image samples taken @ 200, 400 & 800 ISO settings

The DCS-14n does feature a built-in noise reduction function, which unfortunately cannot be turned off even at low ISO settings, or disabled in the DCS Photo Desk software. What it does is that it blurs areas of details or texture, which would otherwise have remained intact. This has both its pros and cons, as it also means that the level of sharpness (which is related conversely with noise reduction functions) is entirely in the hands of the user. Some users, such as graphic artists and advertising houses, would probably prefer a less automated approach, but I suspect those who need to produce images in quantity and speed would welcome this function.

More Touchy-Feely Stuff…

 

 

   

Homepage | Forum | Links | Chat | Articles | About Us | Contact Us

Copyright 2004 Clubsnap Singapore. All Rights Reserved.
All brand names & trademarks are the property of their respective owners.